Has Donald Trump brought his campaign back on track? The overall evaluation of the President’s speech may suggest so. The improvement was a must. Trump’s election campaign got a rocky start and coronavirus intensified his worries.

Dems didn't miss to capitalize on Trump’s mismanagement of the virus – many said that Trump absolutely failed at taming the virus and keep Americans safe. Next, the nomination of Kamala Harris pushed Trump on the back foot, and then staging the convention at White House attracted an enormous amount of criticism.

Putting an end to all that, Trump’s nomination acceptance speech may have resurrected the hopes if the opinion of one proportion of the population is considered.

According to Nielsen company’s report, the convention’s third night on Fox News attracted a total of 7 million viewers while other cable networks couldn’t register even more than 2 million viewers. Good attendance at Fox can be attributed to Fox's nature as a Trump-favoring channel. It’s not important if the impression is correct or not, what really matters what’s the review of Trump’s uncommonly lengthy speech.   

Although a few said that Trump’s speech was cheerful, many others believed that his speech was filled with lies and was an utter fraud.

ABC News analyst Sara Fagen said that the speech was Donald Trump’s best production ever. On the other hand, MSNBC's Joy Reid identified the quality of repugnance in everything Trump had to say. Such has been the appraisal – poles apart.

The long speech included the typical politically-charged opinions and inevitable aim at Joe Biden. Trump didn’t hold himself from candidly putting up his aggressive views of the Democratic party’s presidential candidate.

Trump claimed that Biden and the team would destroy America – and American people have to decide whether they want a government that protects them or one that is a violent anarchist which threatens society.

All in all, the speech contained a typical election tone that some liked and others disliked. Fox's Brit Hume said, “Overall as a convention, I think it’s pretty clear that this show, and that’s what it was, packed more wallop than those we saw last week."

In contrast to that, ABC News White House correspondent Jonathan Karl labeled it as “the longest and lowest-energy speeches” ever by a President.

Voters are sure to be puzzled – so many voices to hear, so many opinions to understand, and are left with only two options. November 3 carries the answer as to where they go.