Meghan Markle could’ve, allegedly, been killed by the royal family just like Princess Diana if she didn’t quit The Firm.

According to National Enquirer, Markle and Princess Diana suffered similar fates when they first joined the royal family. And the Princess of Wales’ life ended abruptly following a tragic car crash in Paris.

Conspiracy theories continue to claim that Prince Charles and the royal family are behind the late royal’s accident. However, these claims have never been proven.

An unnamed source told the tabloid that Prince William and Prince Harry’s mom was like a lamb to the slaughter when she married Prince Charles. After giving birth to her sons, Princess Diana became a virtual prisoner in the palace. She was also abandoned by the Prince of Wales, who had an affair with Camilla.

“Diana died because she refused to toe the royal line. Meghan is another loose cannon who keeps thumbing her nose at royal protocol. We fear this can only end in heartbreak and disaster – just like Diana!” the source said.

Before her accident, Princess Diana, allegedly, wrote to her royal butler, Paul Burrell. She seemingly predicted her accident when she said that Prince Charles was planning an accident in her car, which could be caused by a brake failure and result in a serious head injury.

And since Markle, allegedly, declared that she and Princess Diana were so alike, there are fears that she could follow in her mother-in-law’s footsteps.

“Meghan told a friend, ‘Diana and I are so much alike. I know if she had lived, we would have been the best of friends.’ It’s clear Meghan believes, ‘I’m the new Di,’” the source said.

Luckily for Markle, she already quit the royal family even before her life gets put in danger. Today, she and Prince Harry are living a quiet but not so private life in Los Angeles.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex just filed another lawsuit against a publication that released photos of their 1-year-old son, Archie playing in their backyard.

In the court documents, the royal couple’s lawyer said that the tabloid purposely lied about the location where the photo was taken because they know that they are not allowed to take photos in private locations.

“The unscrupulous people shopping these photographs have not innocently mislabeled the photographs as having been taken in a public place. They have done so intentionally because they know that unsolicited photographs of a young child in the privacy of his own home are very much unlawful,” they said (via People).