The exclusion of O.J. Simpson from the 'In Memoriam' segment at the 2024 ESPY Awards has ignited a wave of reactions across social media. The annual ceremony, which honors achievements in sports, paid tribute to athletes who passed away over the past year but notably left out the Pro Football Hall of Famer.

The decision to exclude Simpson contrasts sharply with his inclusion in a similar segment during the 2024 BET Awards. At the BET Awards, Simpson's appearance was met with an awkward silence, reflecting the complex legacy of the former NFL star who was acquitted of the 1994 murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown and her friend Ronald Goldman but later found liable in a civil suit.

The exclusion has not gone unnoticed. Social media platforms lit up with comments and criticisms, with users expressing a mix of approval and outrage. The family of Nicole Brown has been particularly vocal. Nicole's sister, Tanya Brown, condemned the BET Awards for including Simpson in their tribute, calling it "inappropriate."

"Whoever thought of doing that owes every domestic violence victim an apology ... and that's including our family," Tanya Brown told NBC News. "And they should be fired."

Fred Goldman, the father of Ronald Goldman, echoed these sentiments, telling TMZ, "The network shouldn't include anyone of that caliber -- a wife beater, murderer ... can't imagine why they would include someone like that."

Simpson, who was 76 when he died of prostate cancer in April, remains a polarizing figure in American culture. His 1995 acquittal and subsequent conviction in a wrongful death civil suit continue to provoke strong emotions. The ESPYs' decision to omit him from the tribute aligns with a broader societal discomfort with celebrating individuals with such contentious histories.

Social media reactions were swift and varied. One Twitter user expressed relief at Simpson's exclusion from the ESPYs tribute, saying, "I nearly changed the channel once O.J. Simpson popped up on the screen during that 'In Memoriam' at the BET Awards 2024. Like no.... He should have been excluded."

Another user criticized the BET Awards' decision, highlighting the perceived imbalance in recognizing figures like Simpson over others they deemed more deserving: "You put O.J. SIMPSON in the 'In Memoriam' slideshow, but not Andre Braugher?!?! Really, #BETAwards? REALLY?!?!"

The ESPYs' choice to leave out Simpson reflects a careful consideration of public sentiment and the potential backlash of honoring such a divisive figure. Simpson's legacy, marred by his legal battles and public perception, presents a challenge for any institution trying to navigate the complexities of his contributions to sports versus his notorious personal life.

While Simpson's football career was undoubtedly remarkable, his off-field actions have cast a long shadow over his legacy. The ESPYs' decision suggests a shift towards prioritizing the values and ethics of the individuals they choose to honor, aiming to avoid controversy and align with broader societal expectations.

The debate over Simpson's place in public tributes underscores a larger conversation about how to handle the legacies of figures with complicated histories. As institutions like the ESPYs and BET Awards continue to grapple with these issues, the reactions from the public and affected families highlight the ongoing tension between honoring achievements and acknowledging past transgressions.