Prince Harry has launched a new lawsuit against the Associated Newspapers for libel on Wednesday. Royal journalist Cameron Walker told his followers on social media about the matter, according to Express UK.

He noted that it remains unknown which title or article the royal-born Prince is looking after. Nevertheless, the Duke of Sussex reportedly intends to take the publisher to the High Court.

“Finding Freedom” co-author Omid Scobie released a similar social media post earlier on the same day. As clarified, a spokesperson for the Sussex couple has confirmed about the new legal battle, adding that the complaint is against Associated Newspapers, which is the “publisher of the Daily MailMail on Sunday, and Mail Online.”

The royal expert continued that the public should expect to learn further details of the libel action in the next few weeks “as documents filed with the British High Court become available to the public domain.”

Hours later, Scobie released a new post on Twitter, revealing some of the details about the suit. As stated, it is about a “defamatory” report, which alleges Prince Harry "lied about offering to pay for police protection in June, and tried to hide his Home Office litigation.”

In the same post, the expert included a photo of the article in question from the Mail On Sunday titled, “REVEALED: How Harry tried to keep his legal fight over bodyguards secret.” It is, also, pointed out that the same publication is “currently paying out substantial damages to Meghan [Markle].”

Express UK, later on, said that Prince Harry’s latest legal battle follows the civil lawsuit the Duchess of Sussex brought against the same publisher. It centered on the Mail on Sunday and Mail Online’s publication of parts of the former actress’s 2018 “personal and private” letter to her estranged father, Thomas Markle.

While the defendant reportedly argued that it was in the public interest to reveal the content, the High Court agreed they had breached Meghan Markle’s privacy. She won the ruling and was awarded £1 for misuse of private information, alongside a “substantial” amount in damages for copyright infringement.

Meanwhile, Prince Harry’s legal challenge against a decision from the Home Office, preventing him from not personally paying for police protection in the United Kingdom, had its first hearing on Friday. A rep for the Duke of Sussex stated that the claim was filed in September to "challenge the decision-making behind the security procedures" in hopes of a re-evaluation.